Immigrants from Ukraine vs Sri Lankan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ukraine
Sri Lankan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ukraine
Sri Lankans
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ukraine vs Sri Lankan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 289,107,517 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ukraine and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.782 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 439,246,520 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 0.75%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ukraine | Sri Lankan |
Minimum | 2.0% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 40.0% | 45.5% |
Range | 38.0% | 43.2% |
Mean | 10.5% | 10.8% |
Median | 7.8% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 11.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ukraine and Sri Lankans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ukraine are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Nepal (8.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Yugoslavian (8.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Chilean (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Brazil (8.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (8.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Argentina (8.4%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |