Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Poverty
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Sri Lankans
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 439,246,520 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,739,253 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 8.2%, a difference of 3.2%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sri Lankan | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Minimum | 2.3% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 45.5% | 15.6% |
Range | 43.2% | 13.8% |
Mean | 10.8% | 7.1% |
Median | 8.6% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 8.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Argentina (8.4%, a difference of 0.50%), Puget Sound Salish (8.4%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (8.4%, a difference of 0.66%), Portuguese (8.4%, a difference of 0.84%), and Argentinean (8.4%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Canadian (8.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Israel (8.2%, a difference of 0.34%), South African (8.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Russia (8.2%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (8.2%, a difference of 0.66%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Canadians | 94.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 93.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 8.2% |
South Africans | 93.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Russia | 93.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 8.2% |
French | 92.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 91.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Soviet Union | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Pakistanis | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |