Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Native Hawaiian
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Native Hawaiians
Immigrants from Ethiopia
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
108th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,771,814 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099 and weighted average of 19.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,222,797 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.027 and weighted average of 20.0%, a difference of 0.49%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Native Hawaiian | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 9.4% |
| Maximum | 61.4% | 33.7% |
| Range | 59.3% | 24.3% |
| Mean | 22.5% | 19.6% |
| Median | 20.0% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.1% | 17.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.6% | 21.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.4% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.8% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Native Hawaiians and Immigrants from Ethiopia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Colombian (19.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Western Asia (19.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Syria (19.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Ethiopian (19.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Israeli (19.9%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Polish (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), South American (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 97.1 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |