Lebanese vs Chickasaw Unemployment
COMPARE
Lebanese
Chickasaw
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Lebanese
Chickasaw
5.1%
UNEMPLOYMENT
89.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lebanese vs Chickasaw Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 401,244,101 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.761 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,562,181 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.315 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 1.0%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lebanese | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.70% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 17.6% |
| Range | 99.3% | 17.1% |
| Mean | 10.4% | 5.6% |
| Median | 5.2% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.2% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.9% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.7% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Lebanese and Chickasaw by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Lebanese are Immigrants from Switzerland (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Macedonian (5.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from France (5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Germany (5.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (5.1%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Osage (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Maltese (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Romania (5.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Turkey (5.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 94.1 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Chickasaw | 94.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Osage | 94.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Maltese | 94.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 93.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 93.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 93.3 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 93.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Chileans | 93.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| South Africans | 92.6 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Argentineans | 92.4 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 92.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 91.1 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 91.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 91.0 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 90.8 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 89.7 /100 | #119 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Macedonians | 89.7 /100 | #120 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Lebanese | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 89.1 /100 | #122 | Excellent 5.1% |