Jordanian vs Ute Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Jordanian
Ute
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Jordanians
Ute
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Ute Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,455,872 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,563,406 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 21.8%, a difference of 47.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian | Ute |
Minimum | 1.7% | 9.6% |
Maximum | 38.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 36.5% | 90.4% |
Mean | 14.9% | 33.1% |
Median | 13.2% | 25.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 18.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 39.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 21.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 22.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 22.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Northern European (14.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Canada (14.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Belarus (14.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Australian (14.8%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Macedonians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Swiss | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Australians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Austrians | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 96.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.3 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Germans | 96.3 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | France | 96.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Demographics Similar to Ute by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.29%), African (21.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.80%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |