Jordanian vs Chinese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Jordanian
Chinese
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Jordanians
Chinese
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Chinese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,455,872 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,581,051 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 20.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian | Chinese |
Minimum | 1.7% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 38.3% | 53.8% |
Range | 36.5% | 51.4% |
Mean | 14.9% | 15.2% |
Median | 13.2% | 12.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 17.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 12.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 12.2% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Northern European (14.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Canada (14.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Belarus (14.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Australian (14.8%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Macedonians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Swiss | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Australians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Austrians | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 96.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.3 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Germans | 96.3 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | France | 96.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Iranian (12.4%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.5%, a difference of 0.96%), Immigrants from Iran (12.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (12.7%, a difference of 3.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |