Spanish vs Ute Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Spanish
Ute
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Spanish
Ute
16.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
28.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish vs Ute Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 414,340,286 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.411 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,563,406 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 21.8%, a difference of 29.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish | Ute |
Minimum | 2.9% | 9.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 97.1% | 90.4% |
Mean | 34.8% | 33.1% |
Median | 24.1% | 25.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.8% | 18.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.7% | 39.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 29.9% | 21.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.6% | 22.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.4% | 22.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Spanish by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish are Aleut (16.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uganda (16.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from the Azores (16.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (17.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and Celtic (17.0%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Morocco | 34.6 /100 | #187 | Fair 16.8% |
Arabs | 34.5 /100 | #188 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.8% |
Kenyans | 32.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Azores | 31.3 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 31.3 /100 | #192 | Fair 16.8% |
Aleuts | 28.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 16.9% |
Spanish | 28.6 /100 | #194 | Fair 16.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 25.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.0% |
Celtics | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.0% |
Spaniards | 24.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 22.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 22.4 /100 | #199 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.2% |
Demographics Similar to Ute by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.29%), African (21.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.80%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |