Inupiat vs Ute Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Inupiat
Ute
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Inupiat
Ute
20.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
297th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Ute Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,999,141 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.205 and weighted average of 20.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,563,406 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 21.8%, a difference of 5.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Inupiat | Ute |
Minimum | 5.0% | 9.6% |
Maximum | 65.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 60.5% | 90.4% |
Mean | 30.6% | 33.1% |
Median | 23.6% | 25.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.2% | 18.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.8% | 39.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 31.6% | 21.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.9% | 22.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.7% | 22.1% |
Demographics Similar to Inupiat and Ute by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Immigrants from West Indies (20.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican (20.9%, a difference of 0.52%), Hispanic or Latino (21.0%, a difference of 0.93%), Somali (21.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and Choctaw (21.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.80%), and Dutch West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 20.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 20.8% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 20.9% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 21.0% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 21.1% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.2% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |