Jordanian vs Egyptian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Jordanian
Egyptian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Jordanians
Egyptians
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Egyptian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,455,872 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 273,353,549 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.789 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 1.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian | Egyptian |
Minimum | 1.7% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 38.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 36.5% | 96.4% |
Mean | 14.9% | 18.3% |
Median | 13.2% | 15.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 18.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 15.3% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Egyptians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Northern European (14.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Canada (14.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Belarus (14.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Australian (14.8%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from Turkey (14.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Argentinean (14.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Tlingit-Haida (14.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Russia (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (14.6%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Taiwanese | 98.0 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.0 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 97.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 97.9 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Argentineans | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 97.9 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Egyptians | 97.9 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Macedonians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Swiss | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Australians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Austrians | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 96.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.3 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 14.9% |