Jordanian vs Chinese Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Jordanian
Chinese
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Jordanians
Chinese
10.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
78th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.3%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Chinese Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,388,357 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.129 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.188 and weighted average of 10.3%, a difference of 1.5%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian | Chinese |
Minimum | 3.6% | 4.2% |
Maximum | 19.9% | 33.9% |
Range | 16.3% | 29.7% |
Mean | 10.0% | 12.1% |
Median | 9.7% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 12.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Chinese by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Vietnam (10.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Mongolian (10.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Chile (10.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Croatia (10.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and Latvian (10.2%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Italy (10.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (10.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from South Africa (10.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (10.3%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants | Chile | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Mongolians | 99.4 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Jordanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Latvians | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Russians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Sri Lankans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 99.1 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Nicaraguans | 99.1 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Chileans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Uruguayans | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Afghans | 98.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Chinese | 98.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 98.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.3% |