Indian (Asian) vs Chinese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Chinese
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Chinese
13.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Chinese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 481,525,244 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.100 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,581,051 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 7.9%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Chinese |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 27.7% | 53.8% |
| Range | 26.3% | 51.4% |
| Mean | 11.5% | 15.2% |
| Median | 10.6% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.2% | 17.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 10.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 12.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) and Chinese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Japan (13.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and Cypriot (13.2%, a difference of 0.98%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Iranian (12.4%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.5%, a difference of 0.96%), Immigrants from Iran (12.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (12.7%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |