Eastern European vs Chinese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Eastern European
Chinese
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Eastern Europeans
Chinese
13.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Eastern European vs Chinese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,083,832 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Eastern Europeans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.711 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,581,051 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 9.6%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Eastern European | Chinese |
Minimum | 1.0% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 53.8% |
Range | 99.0% | 51.4% |
Mean | 15.5% | 15.2% |
Median | 9.0% | 12.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.3% | 17.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.1% | 12.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.8% | 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Eastern Europeans and Chinese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Eastern Europeans are Immigrants from China (13.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 1.3%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Iranian (12.4%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.5%, a difference of 0.96%), Immigrants from Iran (12.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (12.7%, a difference of 3.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |