Iroquois vs Cherokee Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Iroquois
Cherokee
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Iroquois
Cherokee
25.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Cherokee Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,850,666 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.580 and weighted average of 25.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,754,756 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.267 and weighted average of 25.7%, a difference of 0.32%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iroquois | Cherokee |
| Minimum | 11.7% | 10.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 88.3% | 90.0% |
| Mean | 41.3% | 37.0% |
| Median | 32.1% | 33.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.3% | 26.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.9% | 42.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.6% | 16.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.2% | 15.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.8% | 15.4% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Cherokee by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.68%), Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.79%), Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.84%), and Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.51%), and Central American Indian (25.5%, a difference of 0.80%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |