Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cherokee Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Cherokee
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Cherokee
22.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cherokee Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,274,747 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055 and weighted average of 22.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,754,756 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.267 and weighted average of 25.7%, a difference of 13.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | Cherokee |
Minimum | 8.5% | 10.0% |
Maximum | 52.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 43.5% | 90.0% |
Mean | 24.5% | 37.0% |
Median | 23.1% | 33.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.5% | 26.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.7% | 42.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 16.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 15.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Sudan (22.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Liberia (22.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Belize (22.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Delaware (22.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 22.4% |
Belizeans | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Iroquois (25.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |