Iroquois vs Cherokee Poverty
COMPARE
Iroquois
Cherokee
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Iroquois
Cherokee
14.5%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Cherokee Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,260,268 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.624 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,337,715 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.341 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 1.2%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | Cherokee |
Minimum | 3.3% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 54.1% |
Range | 96.7% | 52.4% |
Mean | 21.2% | 19.3% |
Median | 15.1% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.3% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.6% | 22.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.3% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.5% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.3% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Cherokee by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Guyanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Guyana (14.5%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Cape Verdean (14.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (14.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Liberia (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Ottawa (14.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 14.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 14.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 14.3% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |