Immigrants from Bolivia vs Cherokee Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bolivia
Cherokee
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bolivia
Cherokee
17.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bolivia vs Cherokee Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,883,444 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.368 and weighted average of 17.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,754,756 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.267 and weighted average of 25.7%, a difference of 43.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bolivia | Cherokee |
Minimum | 3.6% | 10.0% |
Maximum | 82.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 78.9% | 90.0% |
Mean | 19.6% | 37.0% |
Median | 17.3% | 33.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 26.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.9% | 42.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 16.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.6% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 15.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bolivia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Lithuania (17.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Ireland (17.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Indian (Asian) (17.9%, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Iroquois (25.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |