Immigrants from Dominica vs Cherokee Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Dominica
Cherokee
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Dominica
Cherokee
23.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
284th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Dominica vs Cherokee Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,649,694 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominica and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 23.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,754,756 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.267 and weighted average of 25.7%, a difference of 7.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Dominica | Cherokee |
Minimum | 2.0% | 10.0% |
Maximum | 64.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 62.4% | 90.0% |
Mean | 24.4% | 37.0% |
Median | 23.5% | 33.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.7% | 26.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.1% | 42.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 16.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.0% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 15.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Dominica by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Dominica are German Russian (23.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Guatemalan (23.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Zaire (23.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.82%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (24.1%, a difference of 0.86%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 24.4% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Iroquois (25.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |