Iroquois vs Native/Alaskan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Iroquois
Native/Alaskan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Iroquois
Natives/Alaskans
25.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Native/Alaskan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,850,666 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.580 and weighted average of 25.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 503,027,149 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.353 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 9.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iroquois | Native/Alaskan |
| Minimum | 11.7% | 8.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 73.3% |
| Range | 88.3% | 65.1% |
| Mean | 41.3% | 37.0% |
| Median | 32.1% | 36.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.3% | 30.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.9% | 42.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.6% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.2% | 10.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.8% | 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Natives/Alaskans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Cherokee (25.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.68%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and Chickasaw (26.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Yakama (28.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 0.64%), Ute (28.4%, a difference of 0.68%), Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and Apache (27.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |