Iraqi vs Hungarian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Iraqi
Hungarian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Iraqis
Hungarians
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
64.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
39.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
184th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iraqi vs Hungarian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 169,824,152 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iraqis and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141 and weighted average of 20.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,502,236 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.568 and weighted average of 21.1%, a difference of 1.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iraqi | Hungarian |
Minimum | 0.98% | 6.0% |
Maximum | 45.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 44.5% | 94.0% |
Mean | 21.3% | 31.6% |
Median | 20.2% | 22.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.1% | 18.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.9% | 40.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 21.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 22.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 21.8% |
Demographics Similar to Iraqis and Hungarians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iraqis are Ugandan (20.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Slovak (21.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Slavic (21.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.18%), European (21.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and British (21.1%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |