Iraqi vs Alaskan Athabascan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Iraqi
Alaskan Athabascan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Iraqis
Alaskan Athabascans
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
64.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
279th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iraqi vs Alaskan Athabascan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 169,824,152 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iraqis and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141 and weighted average of 20.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,584,348 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 23.6%, a difference of 13.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iraqi | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 0.98% | 6.0% |
| Maximum | 45.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 44.5% | 94.0% |
| Mean | 21.3% | 41.2% |
| Median | 20.2% | 33.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.1% | 20.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.9% | 51.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 31.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 28.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 28.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Iraqis by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iraqis are Ugandan (20.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Nonimmigrants (23.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German (23.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from the Azores (23.5%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Zaire (23.8%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
| German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |