Indian (Asian) vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
White/Caucasian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Whites/Caucasians
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
54.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,574,283 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 583,112,868 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.887 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 9.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Indian (Asian) | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 10.3% |
| Maximum | 21.9% | 33.9% |
| Range | 19.5% | 23.6% |
| Mean | 11.0% | 16.7% |
| Median | 10.7% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Austrian (12.2%, a difference of 0.010%), German (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Ukrainian (12.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Austrians | 97.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
| Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |