Indian (Asian) vs Turkish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Turkish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Turks
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Turkish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,574,283 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,658,978 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.052 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 2.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Turkish |
Minimum | 2.4% | 0.67% |
Maximum | 21.9% | 22.9% |
Range | 19.5% | 22.2% |
Mean | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Median | 10.7% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 7.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 12.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) and Turks by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are German (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Ukrainian (12.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Asia (12.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Asian (11.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Japan (11.9%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Romania (12.0%, a difference of 0.63%), and Slovene (12.0%, a difference of 0.64%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 12.2% |