Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
White/Caucasian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Whites/Caucasians
15.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
252nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
54.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,266,194 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059 and weighted average of 15.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 583,112,868 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.887 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 14.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 6.5% | 10.3% |
| Maximum | 36.2% | 33.9% |
| Range | 29.7% | 23.6% |
| Mean | 17.0% | 16.7% |
| Median | 15.8% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.2% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.2% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (15.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Africa (15.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Liberian (15.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
| Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |