Immigrants from Grenada vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Grenada
White/Caucasian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Grenada
Whites/Caucasians
16.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
305th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
54.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Grenada vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,188,736 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 16.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 583,112,868 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.887 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 25.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Grenada | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 0.74% | 10.3% |
| Maximum | 36.5% | 33.9% |
| Range | 35.8% | 23.6% |
| Mean | 14.4% | 16.7% |
| Median | 14.3% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.4% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Grenada by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Grenada are Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Caribbean (16.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Seminole (16.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and African (16.9%, a difference of 0.45%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
| Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |