Immigrants from Serbia vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Serbia
White/Caucasian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Serbia
Whites/Caucasians
12.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
54.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Serbia vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,723,325 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 583,112,868 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.887 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 10.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Serbia | White/Caucasian |
Minimum | 1.5% | 10.3% |
Maximum | 29.2% | 33.9% |
Range | 27.7% | 23.6% |
Mean | 10.9% | 16.7% |
Median | 10.4% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 12.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 19.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Serbia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Estonian (12.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Scandinavian (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Europe (12.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (12.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |