Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Immigrants from Northern Africa
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
68.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,574,283 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,053,699 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 8.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Minimum | 2.4% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 21.9% | 55.9% |
Range | 19.5% | 52.9% |
Mean | 11.0% | 16.3% |
Median | 10.7% | 13.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 17.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 11.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Austrian (12.2%, a difference of 0.010%), German (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Ukrainian (12.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Austrians | 97.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Pennsylvania German (13.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |