Immigrants from Jamaica vs Turkish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jamaica
Turkish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Jamaica
Turks
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jamaica vs Turkish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,557,879 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,658,978 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.052 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 30.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Jamaica | Turkish |
Minimum | 5.5% | 0.67% |
Maximum | 50.6% | 22.9% |
Range | 45.1% | 22.2% |
Mean | 15.9% | 10.0% |
Median | 15.0% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.6% | 7.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.2% | 12.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 4.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jamaica by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jamaica are Shoshone (15.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Jamaican (15.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |