Ugandan vs Turkish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ugandan
Turkish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Ugandans
Turks
14.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
15.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Turkish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,995,237 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.133 and weighted average of 14.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,658,978 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.052 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 17.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ugandan | Turkish |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.67% |
| Maximum | 30.6% | 22.9% |
| Range | 29.3% | 22.2% |
| Mean | 13.6% | 10.0% |
| Median | 13.1% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.8% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 4.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Uruguay (14.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Spaniard (13.9%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Western Asia (13.9%, a difference of 0.84%), Hmong (13.9%, a difference of 0.89%), and Immigrants from Kenya (13.9%, a difference of 0.90%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 28.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 25.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.8% |
| Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
| Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
| Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
| Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |