Immigrants vs Immigrants from China Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants
Immigrants from China
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants
Immigrants from China
21.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
22.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Immigrants from China Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 556,808,964 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.303 and weighted average of 21.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,922,860 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 18.1%, a difference of 18.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 10.5% | 7.4% |
| Maximum | 47.5% | 33.3% |
| Range | 36.9% | 25.9% |
| Mean | 21.2% | 16.3% |
| Median | 20.7% | 15.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.9% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.6% | 18.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 4.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Irish (21.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Nigerian (21.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Kenya (21.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Swiss (21.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Haiti (21.5%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
| Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
| Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
| Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
| Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
| Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
| Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 21.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 16.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 21.5% |
| Finns | 16.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 21.5% |
| Belgians | 16.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 21.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (18.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.68%), Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.75%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |