Northern European vs Immigrants from China Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Northern European
Immigrants from China
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Northern Europeans
Immigrants from China
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
68.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Northern European vs Immigrants from China Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 398,261,787 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.214 and weighted average of 20.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,922,860 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 18.1%, a difference of 14.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Northern European | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 3.3% | 7.4% |
Maximum | 57.3% | 33.3% |
Range | 54.0% | 25.9% |
Mean | 28.3% | 16.3% |
Median | 25.0% | 15.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.7% | 13.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.0% | 18.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.3% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.0% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 4.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Northern Europeans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Northern Europeans are Kenyan (20.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Costa Rican (20.7%, a difference of 0.26%), and Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (18.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.68%), Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.75%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |