Immigrants vs Nicaraguan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants
Nicaraguan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants
Nicaraguans
21.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
22.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
27.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Nicaraguan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 556,808,964 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.303 and weighted average of 21.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,867,505 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020 and weighted average of 21.3%, a difference of 0.46%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants | Nicaraguan |
| Minimum | 10.5% | 7.8% |
| Maximum | 47.5% | 41.4% |
| Range | 36.9% | 33.6% |
| Mean | 21.2% | 21.5% |
| Median | 20.7% | 21.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.9% | 17.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.6% | 24.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants and Nicaraguans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Irish (21.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Nigerian (21.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Kenya (21.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Swiss (21.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Haiti (21.5%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Czechoslovakian (21.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Basque (21.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Japanese (21.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (21.3%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
| Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
| Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
| Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
| Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
| Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
| Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 21.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 16.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 21.5% |
| Finns | 16.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 21.5% |
| Belgians | 16.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 21.5% |
| Ghanaians | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 21.6% |