Immigrants vs Immigrants from China Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants
Immigrants from China
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Immigrants
Immigrants from China
17.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
62.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
94.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Immigrants from China Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 577,580,100 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.332 and weighted average of 17.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 457,042,790 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.039 and weighted average of 16.9%, a difference of 1.8%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 9.1% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 25.7% | 32.2% |
Range | 16.6% | 29.4% |
Mean | 16.6% | 16.0% |
Median | 16.8% | 16.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.0% | 13.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 17.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Immigrants from Portugal (17.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Syria (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ecuador (17.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Albania (17.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and Ecuadorian (17.2%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |
Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163 | Good 17.2% |
Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 64.4 /100 | #166 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Syria | 63.5 /100 | #167 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 62.5 /100 | #168 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 61.8 /100 | #169 | Good 17.2% |
Ecuadorians | 59.6 /100 | #170 | Average 17.2% |
Tlingit-Haida | 59.4 /100 | #171 | Average 17.2% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 56.7 /100 | #172 | Average 17.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 50.2 /100 | #173 | Average 17.3% |
Laotians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 17.3% |
Tsimshian | 49.8 /100 | #175 | Average 17.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Scottish (16.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Europe (16.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Portuguese (16.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Turkish (16.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and South African (16.9%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Koreans | 97.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Yup'ik | 96.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Inupiat | 96.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 96.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 96.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 16.9% |
South Africans | 95.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Scottish | 95.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | China | 94.9 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 94.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Portuguese | 94.7 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Turks | 94.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Scandinavians | 94.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Europeans | 93.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 93.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Nicaraguans | 93.0 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 17.0% |