Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Taiwan Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Scotland
Immigrants from Taiwan
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Scotland
Immigrants from Taiwan
10.6%
POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.7%
POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Taiwan Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,384,756 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.277 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 298,124,801 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.039 and weighted average of 9.7%, a difference of 8.6%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Scotland | Immigrants from Taiwan |
Minimum | 0.74% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 17.6% | 22.5% |
Range | 16.8% | 21.4% |
Mean | 7.8% | 8.0% |
Median | 8.2% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 9.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Taiwan by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Luxembourger (10.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Latvian (10.5%, a difference of 0.39%), Norwegian (10.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and Lithuanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.86%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Taiwan are Thai (9.6%, a difference of 1.5%), Chinese (9.5%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 3.7%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and Filipino (10.1%, a difference of 4.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |