Immigrants from Mexico vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Mexico
Chippewa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Mexico
Chippewa
25.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
306th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Mexico vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,948,318 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.784 and weighted average of 25.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 6.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Mexico | Chippewa |
Minimum | 11.1% | 11.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 87.6% |
Range | 88.9% | 75.7% |
Mean | 37.1% | 38.7% |
Median | 29.3% | 35.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.9% | 26.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.3% | 47.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.4% | 21.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.3% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.2% | 16.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Mexico and Chippewa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Mexico are Immigrants from Dominican Republic (25.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Congo (25.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Potawatomi (25.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Aleut (25.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |