Immigrants from Mexico vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Mexico
Choctaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Mexico
Choctaw
25.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
306th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Mexico vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,948,318 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.784 and weighted average of 25.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,534,581 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 27.2%, a difference of 7.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Mexico | Choctaw |
Minimum | 11.1% | 12.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 88.9% | 87.4% |
Mean | 37.1% | 41.2% |
Median | 29.3% | 38.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.9% | 31.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.3% | 46.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.4% | 15.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.3% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.2% | 16.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Mexico and Choctaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Mexico are Immigrants from Dominican Republic (25.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Potawatomi (25.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Aleut (25.4%, a difference of 0.39%), Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and Central American Indian (25.5%, a difference of 0.56%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 1.4%), Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 1.5%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 2.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |