Panamanian vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Panamanian
Chippewa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Panamanians
Chippewa
21.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
9.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Panamanian vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 278,926,833 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.539 and weighted average of 21.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 23.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Panamanian | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 4.3% | 11.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 87.6% |
| Range | 95.7% | 75.7% |
| Mean | 34.1% | 38.7% |
| Median | 24.0% | 35.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.0% | 26.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 45.9% | 47.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 25.8% | 21.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.1% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.8% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Panamanians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Nepalese (21.7%, a difference of 0.050%), German (21.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Grenada (21.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Eritrea (21.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (21.7%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Jamaicans | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 21.6% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 13.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 21.6% |
| Ecuadorians | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 21.7% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 11.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 21.7% |
| Nepalese | 9.7 /100 | #218 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Panamanians | 9.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Germans | 8.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 8.0 /100 | #221 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 7.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Scottish | 7.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Barbadians | 7.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 21.8% |
| English | 6.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 5.8 /100 | #226 | Tragic 21.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |