Immigrants from Mexico vs Creek Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Mexico
Creek
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Mexico
Creek
25.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
306th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Mexico vs Creek Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,948,318 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.784 and weighted average of 25.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,486,676 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355 and weighted average of 27.4%, a difference of 8.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Mexico | Creek |
| Minimum | 11.1% | 7.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 75.4% |
| Range | 88.9% | 68.3% |
| Mean | 37.1% | 35.3% |
| Median | 29.3% | 34.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.9% | 27.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.3% | 44.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.4% | 16.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.3% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.2% | 12.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Mexico and Creek by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Mexico are Potawatomi (25.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Aleut (25.4%, a difference of 0.39%), Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.41%), Central American Indian (25.5%, a difference of 0.56%), and Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.84%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 0.88%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 1.9%), Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 2.3%), Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |