Argentinean vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Argentinean
Chippewa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Argentineans
Chippewa
19.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Argentinean vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 293,674,093 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.080 and weighted average of 19.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 40.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Argentinean | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 11.9% |
| Maximum | 54.2% | 87.6% |
| Range | 51.2% | 75.7% |
| Mean | 18.7% | 38.7% |
| Median | 17.8% | 35.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.2% | 26.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.3% | 47.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 21.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Argentineans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Tsimshian (19.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (19.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Fiji (19.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Eastern European (19.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Egyptian (19.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Cambodians | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |