Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Chippewa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Chippewa
20.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
56.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,570,063 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.110 and weighted average of 20.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 28.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | Chippewa |
Minimum | 1.5% | 11.9% |
Maximum | 54.5% | 87.6% |
Range | 53.0% | 75.7% |
Mean | 20.2% | 38.7% |
Median | 19.4% | 35.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.0% | 26.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.4% | 47.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 21.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago are New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Moroccan (21.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |