Immigrants from Jamaica vs Shoshone Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jamaica
Shoshone
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Jamaica
Shoshone
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jamaica vs Shoshone Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,557,879 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,611,766 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.346 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 0.060%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Jamaica | Shoshone |
Minimum | 5.5% | 8.0% |
Maximum | 50.6% | 36.8% |
Range | 45.1% | 28.9% |
Mean | 15.9% | 18.3% |
Median | 15.0% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.6% | 12.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.2% | 23.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jamaica and Shoshone by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jamaica are Jamaican (15.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (15.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |