Immigrants from Jamaica vs French American Indian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jamaica
French American Indian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Jamaica
French American Indians
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jamaica vs French American Indian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,557,879 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,968,938 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.595 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 3.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Jamaica | French American Indian |
Minimum | 5.5% | 0.16% |
Maximum | 50.6% | 40.0% |
Range | 45.1% | 39.8% |
Mean | 15.9% | 17.2% |
Median | 15.0% | 16.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.6% | 12.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.2% | 19.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jamaica and French American Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jamaica are Jamaican (15.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Ottawa (15.5%, a difference of 0.43%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (15.4%, a difference of 0.74%), Liberian (15.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (15.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are Immigrants from Armenia (15.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (15.2%, a difference of 0.59%), Sudanese (15.2%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Sudan (15.2%, a difference of 0.90%), and Nepalese (15.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |