Belizean vs Shoshone Female Poverty
COMPARE
Belizean
Shoshone
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Belizeans
Shoshone
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Belizean vs Shoshone Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,152,301 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Belizeans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.315 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,611,766 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.346 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 2.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Belizean | Shoshone |
Minimum | 3.2% | 8.0% |
Maximum | 32.4% | 36.8% |
Range | 29.2% | 28.9% |
Mean | 16.0% | 18.3% |
Median | 15.2% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 12.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.1% | 23.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Belizeans and Shoshone by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Belizeans are Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Barbados (16.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Immigrants from Jamaica (15.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (15.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |