Bangladeshi vs Shoshone Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Shoshone
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Bangladeshis
Shoshone
16.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Shoshone Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,353,886 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 16.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,611,766 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.346 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 2.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bangladeshi | Shoshone |
Minimum | 2.7% | 8.0% |
Maximum | 31.7% | 36.8% |
Range | 29.0% | 28.9% |
Mean | 16.6% | 18.3% |
Median | 15.6% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.9% | 12.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 23.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis and Shoshone by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Central American (16.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Barbados (16.0%, a difference of 0.31%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Immigrants from Jamaica (15.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |