Immigrants from Armenia vs Shoshone Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Armenia
Shoshone
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Armenia
Shoshone
15.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Armenia vs Shoshone Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,710,578 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Armenia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.182 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,611,766 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.346 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 3.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Armenia | Shoshone |
Minimum | 2.5% | 8.0% |
Maximum | 29.5% | 36.8% |
Range | 26.9% | 28.9% |
Mean | 14.0% | 18.3% |
Median | 13.4% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 12.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.3% | 23.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Armenia and Shoshone by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Armenia are Immigrants from Middle Africa (15.2%, a difference of 0.52%), Sudanese (15.2%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Sudan (15.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Nepalese (15.2%, a difference of 0.94%), and Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Immigrants from Jamaica (15.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Jamaican (15.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Ottawa (15.5%, a difference of 0.49%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (15.4%, a difference of 0.80%), and Liberian (15.4%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |