Immigrants from Ireland vs Bhutanese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ireland
Bhutanese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ireland
Bhutanese
7.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ireland vs Bhutanese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 240,395,025 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.485 and weighted average of 7.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,917,990 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.160 and weighted average of 7.0%, a difference of 0.91%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ireland | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 0.55% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 22.9% | 49.5% |
Range | 22.3% | 48.2% |
Mean | 6.1% | 7.3% |
Median | 5.4% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.7% | 8.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ireland and Bhutanese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ireland are Latvian (7.1%, a difference of 1.3%), Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Bulgarian (7.1%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Singapore (7.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and Maltese (7.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Latvian (7.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Bulgarian (7.1%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Singapore (7.1%, a difference of 0.71%), Maltese (7.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and Swedish (7.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |