Immigrants from Ireland vs Bhutanese Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ireland
Bhutanese
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Ireland
Bhutanese
4.9%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
98.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ireland vs Bhutanese Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 240,082,728 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 452,429,173 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.408 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 0.45%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ireland | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 1.1% | 0.60% |
Maximum | 31.4% | 10.5% |
Range | 30.3% | 9.9% |
Mean | 5.9% | 4.6% |
Median | 4.9% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 3.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 5.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ireland and Bhutanese by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ireland are Tlingit-Haida (4.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Hungarian (4.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Cuban (4.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Osage (4.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from North America (4.9%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Scotland (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Canada (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Nepal (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Belgium (4.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Serbians | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Icelanders | 98.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Bhutanese | 98.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 98.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Canada | 98.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 98.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Celtics | 98.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Hungarians | 98.3 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Cubans | 98.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Tlingit-Haida | 98.3 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Osage | 98.2 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 4.9% |
German Russians | 98.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.0 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Russians | 98.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.0 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.0% |