Swedish vs Bhutanese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Swedish
Bhutanese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Swedes
Bhutanese
7.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swedish vs Bhutanese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 535,382,987 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.589 and weighted average of 7.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,917,990 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.160 and weighted average of 7.0%, a difference of 1.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Swedish | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 1.8% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 81.3% | 49.5% |
Range | 79.6% | 48.2% |
Mean | 10.7% | 7.3% |
Median | 6.5% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.9% | 8.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.6% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.5% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Swedes and Bhutanese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Iranian (7.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (7.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Singapore (7.1%, a difference of 0.34%), Bulgarian (7.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and Latvian (7.1%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Latvian (7.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Bulgarian (7.1%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Singapore (7.1%, a difference of 0.71%), Immigrants from Ireland (7.0%, a difference of 0.91%), and Maltese (7.1%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |