Immigrants from Ireland vs Bhutanese Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ireland
Bhutanese
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Immigrants from Ireland
Bhutanese
9.2%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.2%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ireland vs Bhutanese Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 240,220,099 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.242 and weighted average of 9.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,770,052 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 9.2%, a difference of 0.43%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ireland | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 0.30% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 16.9% | 32.4% |
Range | 16.6% | 31.4% |
Mean | 6.3% | 10.2% |
Median | 6.5% | 8.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 12.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ireland and Bhutanese by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ireland are Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Eastern European (9.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Swedish (9.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Australia (9.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Czech (9.2%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Czech (9.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swedish (9.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.2%, a difference of 0.54%), and Eastern European (9.2%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Turks | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |