Immigrants from Singapore vs Bhutanese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Singapore
Bhutanese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Singapore
Bhutanese
7.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Singapore vs Bhutanese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,322,674 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Singapore and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 7.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,917,990 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.160 and weighted average of 7.0%, a difference of 0.71%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Singapore | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 0.70% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 15.7% | 49.5% |
| Range | 15.0% | 48.2% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 7.3% |
| Median | 5.7% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Singapore and Bhutanese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Singapore are Bulgarian (7.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Latvian (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Maltese (7.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Swedish (7.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Iranian (7.1%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Latvian (7.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Bulgarian (7.1%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Ireland (7.0%, a difference of 0.91%), Maltese (7.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and Swedish (7.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |