Immigrants from Iran vs Bhutanese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Iran
Bhutanese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Iran
Bhutanese
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Iran vs Bhutanese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 279,394,600 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iran and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246 and weighted average of 7.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,917,990 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.160 and weighted average of 7.0%, a difference of 3.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Iran | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 0.76% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 15.8% | 49.5% |
Range | 15.0% | 48.2% |
Mean | 6.3% | 7.3% |
Median | 5.6% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.7% | 8.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Iran and Bhutanese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Iran are Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.36%), Danish (7.3%, a difference of 0.44%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Latvian (7.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Bulgarian (7.1%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Singapore (7.1%, a difference of 0.71%), Immigrants from Ireland (7.0%, a difference of 0.91%), and Maltese (7.1%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |